<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Still Working on Web 1.0 (and maybe you should be, too)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zu.com/live/2009/10/ideas/investor-relations/still-working-on-web-1-0-and-maybe-you-should-be-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zu.com/live/2009/10/ideas/investor-relations/still-working-on-web-1-0-and-maybe-you-should-be-too/</link>
	<description>blog, ideas, interactive, life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.zu.com/live/2009/10/ideas/investor-relations/still-working-on-web-1-0-and-maybe-you-should-be-too/comment-page-1/#comment-19053</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zu.com/live/?p=3321#comment-19053</guid>
		<description>Hi Parker,  thanks for the positive feedback on the design, will pass along to Albert, Levi and the rest. Oh, and good tip on the twitpitch URL omission, will be more consistent!

Yah, as you say, a lot of online IR seems to be bare minimum, with everyone nervous about the &quot;risk&quot; of putting up a speech transcript, or what have you. It&#039;s almost like IR is saying to legal &quot;can you say it&#039;s too risky for me to do my job so I can leave early?&quot;, but I may be overly cynical!

As far as good online annual reports, I see their main strengths as being providing material for the more naive investors who are coming up-to-speed with the overall company story; I see them as good resources throughout the year, as they are more convenient to navigate then downloading a PDF; they also are a good way to leverage the effort put into bringing the original report together, (as well as the writing, photography and design). 

At the very least, use the thing for &quot;parts&quot; to bring a lot of other site areas up to date.  

Thanks for feedback, Parker!



But as you mention, it has to start with the idea that it is worth making an effort, and if IROs can&#039;t convince exec that the owners deserve best efforts from their company in keeping them informed, then they may accept the idea that a fully valued share value (presuming a fully understood company) may also be the value of better online IR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Parker,  thanks for the positive feedback on the design, will pass along to Albert, Levi and the rest. Oh, and good tip on the twitpitch URL omission, will be more consistent!</p>
<p>Yah, as you say, a lot of online IR seems to be bare minimum, with everyone nervous about the &#8220;risk&#8221; of putting up a speech transcript, or what have you. It&#8217;s almost like IR is saying to legal &#8220;can you say it&#8217;s too risky for me to do my job so I can leave early?&#8221;, but I may be overly cynical!</p>
<p>As far as good online annual reports, I see their main strengths as being providing material for the more naive investors who are coming up-to-speed with the overall company story; I see them as good resources throughout the year, as they are more convenient to navigate then downloading a PDF; they also are a good way to leverage the effort put into bringing the original report together, (as well as the writing, photography and design). </p>
<p>At the very least, use the thing for &#8220;parts&#8221; to bring a lot of other site areas up to date.  </p>
<p>Thanks for feedback, Parker!</p>
<p>But as you mention, it has to start with the idea that it is worth making an effort, and if IROs can&#8217;t convince exec that the owners deserve best efforts from their company in keeping them informed, then they may accept the idea that a fully valued share value (presuming a fully understood company) may also be the value of better online IR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.zu.com/live/2009/10/ideas/investor-relations/still-working-on-web-1-0-and-maybe-you-should-be-too/comment-page-1/#comment-19051</link>
		<dc:creator>Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zu.com/live/?p=3321#comment-19051</guid>
		<description>I love the blog layout/design, btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the blog layout/design, btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.zu.com/live/2009/10/ideas/investor-relations/still-working-on-web-1-0-and-maybe-you-should-be-too/comment-page-1/#comment-19049</link>
		<dc:creator>Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zu.com/live/?p=3321#comment-19049</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s up, Tony? Long-time reader, first time commenter here at Zu. 

I agree with some of what you&#039;re saying, but I also think that in the field of IR most people are only doing the bare minimum to meet reg. filing rules because that&#039;s all they can afford and no one has given them a reason to care about more. A fancy, online annual report is good in theory. But how many people have the resources to produce one and the audience to make one necessary?

Also - what&#039;s the deal with the twitpitch at the end? If the idea is for someone to share the article, why not also provide them with the link to do so, in the twitpitch text?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s up, Tony? Long-time reader, first time commenter here at Zu. </p>
<p>I agree with some of what you&#8217;re saying, but I also think that in the field of IR most people are only doing the bare minimum to meet reg. filing rules because that&#8217;s all they can afford and no one has given them a reason to care about more. A fancy, online annual report is good in theory. But how many people have the resources to produce one and the audience to make one necessary?</p>
<p>Also &#8211; what&#8217;s the deal with the twitpitch at the end? If the idea is for someone to share the article, why not also provide them with the link to do so, in the twitpitch text?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.zu.com/live/2009/10/ideas/investor-relations/still-working-on-web-1-0-and-maybe-you-should-be-too/comment-page-1/#comment-19047</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zu.com/live/?p=3321#comment-19047</guid>
		<description>Good one, Joe!  

It (the opportunity to &quot;do&quot; social media) strikes me as often being a distraction from the normal hard work of communicating, for many folks.

I agree that it has not killed other forms of communication, and does not pretend to; I may have been a bit grouchy that day, as it seems a bit too distracting in my own workplace some days. Thanks for the response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one, Joe!  </p>
<p>It (the opportunity to &#8220;do&#8221; social media) strikes me as often being a distraction from the normal hard work of communicating, for many folks.</p>
<p>I agree that it has not killed other forms of communication, and does not pretend to; I may have been a bit grouchy that day, as it seems a bit too distracting in my own workplace some days. Thanks for the response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Boughner</title>
		<link>http://www.zu.com/live/2009/10/ideas/investor-relations/still-working-on-web-1-0-and-maybe-you-should-be-too/comment-page-1/#comment-19043</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Boughner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zu.com/live/?p=3321#comment-19043</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not just a web issue. I&#039;m blown away by the number of companies and organizations that &quot;want to blog&quot; or &quot;need to be on Facebook&quot; when their own corporate / organizational culture is miles away from where it needs to be to support such robust, transparent and honest media.

Social media haven&#039;t killed anything. They are a useful bunch of tools that, when used right, can complement other things in your toolkit - including a solid web 1.0 presence - but only if you have the culture to support them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just a web issue. I&#8217;m blown away by the number of companies and organizations that &#8220;want to blog&#8221; or &#8220;need to be on Facebook&#8221; when their own corporate / organizational culture is miles away from where it needs to be to support such robust, transparent and honest media.</p>
<p>Social media haven&#8217;t killed anything. They are a useful bunch of tools that, when used right, can complement other things in your toolkit &#8211; including a solid web 1.0 presence &#8211; but only if you have the culture to support them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

